NCMC OPPOSES FLAWED LONGLINE RESEARCH PLAN
August 2007 -- Swordfish longliners
were shut out of southern coastal waters in 2001 to limit their
catch of overfished and prohibited species. The closures work. Catch
and dead discards of juvenile swords, billfish and sharks are down
40-75 percent from bycatch levels of the late 1990s. So youd
think the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) would be careful
about letting longlining resume in these areas. But it seems the
agency is prepared to let the industry decide when theyre
ready to return and under what conditions; namely now, and for no
better reason than to up their take of swordfish from the closed
areas.
The National Coalition for Marine Conservation opposes issuance
of exempted fishing permits (EFPs) for 13 pelagic longline vessels
to fish in the Florida East Coast and Charleston Bump closed areas.
At an April 3rd meeting with NMFS chief Bill Hogarth, held at the
request of NCMC, we told NMFS we are against the permits because
the scientific experiment they propose to perform (evaluating
bycatch reduction alternatives to the closures) is seriously flawed
and features no criteria for judging success. As a result, it amounts
to little more than a foot-in-the-door attempt by industry to re-enter
the closed areas to longline for swordfish, tuna, dolphin (mahi-mahi)
and sharks.
Because the research proposal was initiated by the longline
industry and developed without input from the scientific community
and members of the public, says NCMC president Ken Hinman,
the EFPs, if approved, could undermine the current and future
conservation benefits of the closed areas. We are urging NMFS to
withdraw the proposal and start over. To issue this EFP at this
time, based on a false urgency to catch more swordfish and fill
our quota, would be both a misuse of the EFP process and a missed
opportunity to conduct bona fide bycatch
reduction research.
Circle Hooks Alone are Not Bycatch
Reduction Research
The EFP application, submitted by Blue Water Fishermans
Association, is based on the notion that the use of circle hooks
by the pelagic longline fleet can replace closures as a means to
limit bycatch. There is a wide range of species that would be taken
by longlines in the Charleston Bump/Florida East Coast areas, including
juvenile swordfish, white marlin, blue marlin, sailfish, dolphin-fish,
large coastal and pelagic sharks. Although circle hooks have been
shown effective in reducing bycatch of some species, especially
on rod-and-reel, there is no evidence of reductions in bycatch mortality
for fish caught on longlines that remain on the hook for up to 12
hours and more. Nor is there evidence indicating a reduction in
post-release mortality for fish released after being on the hook
for so many hours.
NCMC is insisting that any real research into the use of circle
hooks on longlines must also study the effect of various shortened
soak times. In fact, one study indicates that, even using circle
hooks, mortality of bycatch species increases significantly with
each hour after hook-up. Berkeley and Edwards (1998) used hook-timers
in the Gulf of Mexico yellowfin tuna longline fishery to compare
mortality with the time the fish spent on the hook. The tuna longliners
used circle hooks almost exclusively (over 90 percent). The mortality
rate for billfish surpassed 50 percent - that is, more than half
the fish brought up dead - after theyd been on the hook for
about 8 hours. Swordfish (including juveniles that cannot be landed)
surpassed the 50 percent mortality mark less than 2 hours after
hook-up.
To meaningfully measure reductions in bycatch mortality attributable
to circle hooks, the experiment must also test different soak time
lengths (e.g., three hours, six hours, nine hours) and compare survival
rates. In addition, released fish should be tagged with pop-up archival
tags to assess post-release mortality of fish caught on circle hooks
at varying set-lengths. Because the mortality rate for fish taken
on circle hooks increases in the hours after hook-up, it is also
likely that fish released alive have been stressed enough that post-release
mortality may be significant.
Without Strict Performance Criteria,
Success
Could Mean a Net Loss of Conservation
Blue Water says the circle hook performance
data will allow comparison with longline logbook data from
1997-99, prior to implementation of the closures. These data, they
say, could then be used to consider re-opening selected traditional
swordfish fishing grounds.
But the ultimate measure of bycatch reduction success is the effectiveness
of the current closed areas with no longlining. Any lesser standard
would mean a decrease in conservation benefit for a number of species
that are severely overfished and the object of long-range rebuilding
efforts (white marlin, blue marlin, numerous large coastal sharks),
as well as juvenile swordfish, whose survival and growth is still
critical to the long-term recovery of swordfish.
In the three years following full implementation of the time-area
closures (2001-03), the following bycatch reduction rates were achieved
as compared with the pre-closure period 1997-99:
| Juvenile swordfish |
-39.5%
|
| White marlin |
-47.5%
|
| Blue marlin |
-50.3%
|
| Sailfish |
-74.6%
|
| Dolphin |
-47.2%
|
| Large coastal sharks |
-27.9%
|
| Pelagic sharks |
-55.9%
|
These bycatch reduction rates are the standard against which the
performance of gear modifications, as a possible substitute for
the closed areas, must be measured. The longline industry suggests
only the most minimal standard, that is, comparison to bycatch rates
before the closures.
Within the context of a proposal whose ultimate goal is to
allow the U.S. pelagic longline fleet to catch more of the
U.S. quota of swordfish, says Hinman, the public
can have no confidence in management decisions made based on this
research unless the criteria for assessing the results are clearly
spelled out. Because the closed areas are benefiting a wide range
of species, the goal of any bycatch reduction program that might
be considered as a substitute for closed areas must be to achieve
at least the same level of conservation.
Otherwise, we and the fish will lose.
Read the update on
this issue.
View
a map of all areas on the US east and gulf coasts closed to
longlining since 2000.
©
1999-2008 National Coalition for Marine Conservation
4 Royal Street SE, Leesburg, VA 20175 USA
All Rights Reserved
|